2009-VIL-22-SC-DT

Supreme Court of India

Special Leave to Appeal CC Nos. 12886 And 12908 of 2009

Date: 07.09.2009

ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

Vs

HCL TECHNOLOGIES LTD.

For the Petitioner : Vivek Tankha, H. Raghavendra Rao, Rahul Kaushik and B. V. Balaram Das
For the Respondent : Ajay Vohra, Ms. Kavita Jha and Sandeep S. Karhail

BENCH

S. H. Kapadia And Aftab Alam, JJ.

JUDGMENT

1. Delay condoned.

2. Heard both sides.

3. We are of the view that in the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, particularly when the High Court has remitted the matter to the TPO from whose order an appeal is pending before the CIT(A), it would be in the interest of both sides to resort to Alternate Dispute Resolution Mechanism suggested in the Budget of 2009 (see section 144C of the Income-tax Act, 1961). It is made clear that the competent authority will not reject the application herein made by the assessee on the ground that the proposal has come after the cut-off date. The learned Addl. Solicitor General will, accordingly, communicate instructions to the Department. The competent authority will decide the matter notwithstanding the pendency of the appeal before the CIT(A).

Special Leave Petitions are disposed of.

 

DISCLAIMER: Though all efforts have been made to reproduce the order accurately and correctly however the access, usage and circulation is subject to the condition that VATinfoline Multimedia is not responsible/liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any mistake/error/omissions.